This afternoon, a digital forum on X Spaces brought together journalists, activists, and human rights advocates to examine how balanced media reporting can objectively cover the recent emergence of the Amhara Fano National Force (AFNF) without endorsing or glamorizing any form of armed strife. The session, co-organized by Mereja TV and moderated by Amhara activist Meaza Mohammed—the founder of Roha TV—focused on maintaining the essential separation between factual reporting and political advocacy.
The discussion centered on the imperative for the media to fulfill its role as an impartial observer. Rather than amplifying militant rhetoric, participants stressed the need to verify and convey the evolving realities of self-determination through rigorous fact-checking and in-depth analysis. Meaza Mohammed emphasized, “Information is our most potent tool,” highlighting that when media platforms work together responsibly, they expose the genuine experiences of the Amhara people without lending unintentional support to any form of violence.
Representatives from the AFNF shared their accounts of the movement’s journey, outlining the challenges and aspirations of grassroots organizations seeking to secure their rights. However, voices at the event underlined that while it is vital to understand the movement’s perspective and history, media coverage must remain objective—striving to report on the organization’s goals and struggles through a lens that neither sensationalizes nor promotes militarization. A participant noted that building a narrative grounded in verified facts rather than rhetoric helps global audiences better understand the region’s complexities.
Interactive segments allowed attendees—ranging from veteran journalists to concerned citizens—to debate strategies for countering bias and combating misinformation. The emphasis was placed on using digital tools to document the unfolding events accurately and ethically. Rather than fueling the flames of conflict, panelists argued, robust digital engagement should provide context, invite diverse viewpoints, and respect the balance between advocacy for human rights and the avoidance of militaristic glorification.
As the event concluded, there was a mutual commitment to uphold standards of impartial journalism. Attendees recognized that responsible media coverage can serve as a powerful catalyst for accountability and transparency. By continuously refining collaborative reporting strategies, media professionals can ensure that the story of the AFNF—and by extension, the aspirations of the Amhara people—is conveyed with factual integrity while keeping activist fervor separate from news narratives.
In the aftermath of the discussion, there is growing interest in developing international partnerships and campaigns rooted in ethical journalism. Such initiatives have the potential to educate global audiences about the intricate challenges of regional autonomy and human rights, while firmly distancing themselves from any endorsement of violent methods. This proactive approach to media coverage highlights a pathway forward where truth, collaboration, and impartiality set the standard for reporting on politically charged issues.
